Pylint error with abstract member variable
Become part of the top 3% of the developers by applying to Toptal https://topt.al/25cXVn
--
Music by Eric Matyas
https://www.soundimage.org
Track title: Lost Civilization
--
Chapters
00:00 Question
00:46 Accepted answer (Score 5)
01:36 Answer 2 (Score 5)
01:50 Answer 3 (Score 1)
02:10 Thank you
--
Full question
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1653...
--
Content licensed under CC BY-SA
https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/lice...
--
Tags
#python #pylint
#avk47
--
Music by Eric Matyas
https://www.soundimage.org
Track title: Lost Civilization
--
Chapters
00:00 Question
00:46 Accepted answer (Score 5)
01:36 Answer 2 (Score 5)
01:50 Answer 3 (Score 1)
02:10 Thank you
--
Full question
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1653...
--
Content licensed under CC BY-SA
https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/lice...
--
Tags
#python #pylint
#avk47
ACCEPTED ANSWER
Score 5
It is best to define name in A. Consider somebody (or you in couple weeks) wants to inherit from A and implements abstract_function:
class C(A):
def abstract_function(self):
print 'This is not an abstract class'
Now the following will raise an error even though nothing in C seems to be wrong:
c = C()
c.random_function()
If you are using self.name in A it should be defined there (and let's say it should default to something sensible saying it's not ready to use):
class A(object):
name = None
def random_function(self):
print self.name
This will make your code cleaner/less error-prone and you will also get rid of the pylint error.
ANSWER 2
Score 5
If you suffix A with Mixin, pylint will not report it
ANSWER 3
Score 1
In your case I'd could use the following option:
pylint solution.py --generated-members=name
However, it's better to consider adding name = None to the base class.