slqlalchemy UniqueConstraint VS Index(unique=True)
Rise to the top 3% as a developer or hire one of them at Toptal: https://topt.al/25cXVn
--------------------------------------------------
Music by Eric Matyas
https://www.soundimage.org
Track title: Lost Jungle Looping
--
Chapters
00:00 Slqlalchemy Uniqueconstraint Vs Index(Unique=True)
01:32 Accepted Answer Score 6
02:31 Thank you
--
Full question
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4327...
--
Content licensed under CC BY-SA
https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/lice...
--
Tags
#python #mysql #database #sqlalchemy
#avk47
ACCEPTED ANSWER
Score 6
The main difference is that while the Index API allows defining an index outside of a table definition as long as it can reference the table through the passed SQL constructs, a UniqueConstraint and constraints in general must be defined inline in the table definition:
To apply table-level constraint objects such as
ForeignKeyConstraintto a table defined using Declarative, use the__table_args__attribute, described at Table Configuration.
The thing to understand is that during construction of a declarative class a new Table is constructed, if not passed an explicit __table__. In your example model class the UniqueConstraint instance is bound to a class attribute, but the declarative base does not include constraints in the created Table instance from attributes. You must pass it in the table arguments:
class MyTable(DeclBase):
__tablename__ = 'my_table'
...
# A positional argument tuple, passed to Table constructor
__table_args__ = (
UniqueConstraint(attr_2, attr_3, name='my_table_uidx'),
)
Note that you must pass the constraint name as a keyword argument. You could also pass the constraint using Table.append_constraint(), if called before any attempts to create the table:
class MyTable(DeclBase):
...
MyTable.__table__.append_constraint(
UniqueConstraint('attr_2', 'attr_3', name='my_table_uidx'))